Laws & Jurisprudence
CASUALTY INSURANCE
8:39 PM
Casualty
insurance
covers loss or liability arising from accident or mishap, excluding those
falling  under types of insurance as fire
or marine. (Sec.  174)    
The following are the two  divisions  of 
casualty  insurance :
1.     Accident or
health insurance – Insurance against specified perils which  may affect the person and/or property  of the insured.    E.g. 
personal  accident,  robbery/theft 
insurance  
2.     Third  party 
liability  insurance  – Insurance against specified perils
which  may give rise to liability on the
part of  the  insured 
of  claims  for 
injuries  or  damage to property of others. 
some rules on “third party liability 
insurance”
1.     Insurable  interest 
is  based  on  the  interest of the insured in the safety of  the 
persons,  and  their 
property,  who  may maintain an action against him in  case 
of  their  injury 
or  destruction  respectively.    
2.     In a third
party liability (TPL) insurance 
contract,  the  insurer 
assumes  the  obligation 
by  paying  the 
injured  third  party 
to  whom  the 
insured  is  liable. 
Prior  payment  by 
the  insured  to 
the  third person is not necessary
in order  that  the 
obligation  may  arise. 
The  moment the insured becomes
liable to  third persons, the insured
acquires an  interest in the insurance
contract which  may be garnished like any
other credit.    
3.     In  burglary, 
robbery  and  theft 
insurance,  the  opportunity 
to  defraud  the insurer (moral hazard)  is so great 
that insurer have found it necessary to 
fill  up  the 
policies  with  many 
restrictions  designed  to 
reduce  the  hazard. Persons frequently excluded are  those 
in  the  insured’s 
service  and  employment. 
The  purpose  of 
the  exception  is 
to  guard  against 
liability  should  theft  be  committed 
by  one  having 
unrestricted  access  to 
the  property.
4.     Right of
third party injured to sue the 
insurer  of  party 
at  fault  depends 
on  whether  the 
contract  of  insurance 
is  intended to benefit third
persons also  or only the insured  
Under these instances the injured person have the right  to sue insurer of the party at fault:
1.     Indemnity against third party liability – injured
third party can directly sue the 
insurer. The purpose is to protect injured person against  the insolvency of the insured who causes  such injury.
2.     Indemnity  against  actual 
loss  or  payment – third party has no cause
of  action  against 
the  insurer.  The 
third  person’s  recourse 
is  limited  to 
the  insured alone. The contract
is solely for  the insurer to reimburse
the insured for  liability actually
satisfied by him. 
It must be noted that the  insurer 
is  not  solidarily 
liable  with  the 
insured. The insurer’s liability is based on contract;  that of the insured is based on torts.
Furthermore,  the insurer’s liability is
limited by the amount of the  insurance
coverage. 
Liability insurance is a contract of
indemnity  for the benefit of the insured
and those in privity  with him, or those
to whom the law upon the  grounds of
public policy extends the indemnity 
against liability. 
Liability of the insurer and that of the
insured in case for indemnity against third person liability:
1.     Insurer’s
liability is direct but  the  insurer 
cannot  be  held 
solidarily  liable  with 
the  insured  and 
other parties at fault.   While
the liability of the insured is direct and can 
be held liable with all the 
parties at fault.  
2.     Insurer’s
liability  is  based 
on  contract. Whereas the
liability of the insured is based on tort. 
3.     Insurer’s
third‐party liability is only up to the extent of the insurance policy  and 
that  required  by 
law. On the other hand, the liability of the insured extends to  the amount of actual and  other damages. (Heirs of George Y. Poe v. Malayan
Insurance Company,  Inc.  G.R. No. 156302, Apr. 7,  2009)  
“no action” clause
It 
is  a  requirement 
in  a  policy 
of  liability  insurance 
which  provides  that 
suit  and  final 
judgment be first obtained against the insured,  that 
only  thereafter  can 
the  person  injured 
recover on the policy. (Guingon v. Del Monte, G.R.  No. L‐21806, Aug. 17, 1967)    
A 
“no  action”  clause 
must  yield  to 
the  provisions  of 
the  Rules  of 
Court  regarding  multiplicity of suits. (Shafter v. RTC, G.R.
No. 78848,  Nov. 14, 1988)  
The author takes no responsibility for the validity, correctness and result of this work. The information provided is not a legal advice and it should not be used  as a substitute for a competent legal advice from a licensed lawyer. See the disclaimer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

0 comments